‘There really is no escape’: Faith leaders help immigrants face court as ICE arrests rise
(RNS) — San Diego Auxiliary Bishop Felipe Pulido noticed the way a father held his young daughter and stood close to his wife and teenage daughter in the courtroom. The love and care they had for each other was palpable on Tuesday (Aug. 12), when Pulido accompanied the asylum-seeking family for an immigration court hearing.
“As an immigrant, I got emotional because of that connection I have with my own family — I put myself in his shoes,” said the Catholic bishop, who was born in the Mexican state of Michoacán before immigrating to Yakima Valley in Washington as a teenager. He finished high school there, worked picking produce and eventually was ordained a priest.
Immigrants are facing court appointments with newly heightened levels of fear as the Trump administration has begun sending agents to detain migrants as they leave the courtroom. If immigration judges dismiss their cases, they can immediately face expedited removal proceedings without a chance to make their case for asylum. Previously, a 10-day response time to the dismissal was allowed.
Guided by their faith, clergy like Pulido and other representatives from religious groups are accompanying immigrants to court appointments to provide comfort and information and, in cases where their worst fears are realized, to pick up the pieces of a shattered American dream.
The Rev. Noel Andersen, national field director at Church World Service who is ordained in the United Church of Christ, holds a weekly call on faith-based court accompaniment. He told RNS that through accompaniment, “Faith leaders bear witness and speak out against the ways masked ICE agents are abducting our community members.” Accompaniment is taking place “in every major city and in some rural areas, just about everywhere there is an immigration court,” he said.
When it was time to leave their San Diego hearing, Pulido said, the family saw half a dozen United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, and the mother told him she was scared. The bishop stuck close to the family, talking and reassuring them as they walked by the agents, he said. The judge had given them another hearing in December.
Pulido was present because the San Diego Catholic Church has partnered with Episcopal, Lutheran, Jewish and Muslim clergy, as well as lay people, to provide accompaniment for immigrants at the courthouse every day in August. They have more than 50 volunteers, and as more sign up, they’re planning to continue the ministry.
It was only when they’d gotten through the ordeal safely that the family asked Pulido which church he was with. The Catholic family were stunned to learn a bishop had accompanied them that day, he said.
Pulido said he was inspired by Pope Francis’ words last year when he attended “baby bishop camp,” an orientation for new bishops in Rome, to get involved in the court accompaniment ministry. “Be a sign of hope for the homeless, for the migrants, for those who are in prison,” he recalled Francis saying.
He said he believes sometimes ICE agents choose not to detain migrants even after their cases are dismissed because his priests are walking with them, though they have also witnessed detentions.
Pulido isn’t the only Catholic bishop who has gone to immigration court. In Orange County, where priests and deacons are also accompanying the faithful in immigration court, Bishop Kevin Vann attended the July bond hearing of Narciso Barranco, an immigrant without legal status and father of three U.S. Marines who was filmed being beaten in the head by immigration agents during his June arrest.
El Paso, Texas, Bishop Mark Seitz was also in immigration court on Tuesday, said Scalabrinian Sister Leticia Gutiérrez, the director of the diocese’s migrant hospitality ministry.
Seitz witnessed the detention of three people — “the sobbing, the anguish of the wife of one of them,” said Gutiérrez in Spanish. Seitz told her, “I saw Jesus walking through the hallway, sister, defenseless.”
Gutiérrez, who has organized a precise system for the diocese’s immigration court accompaniment in the last two months, arrives at immigration court at exactly 7:50 a.m., four days a week, and stays until the final cases have concluded.
Before ICE agents arrive (about 20 minutes after she does), Gutiérrez and a priest who is a retired immigration lawyer introduce themselves to migrants arriving for court and provide them basic legal advice and information — and try to sit with them in their anxiety.
While some of the diocesan team members observe the court sessions, ICE agents have also allowed them a protected zone in the waiting room, so when immigrants leave their court appointments, Gutiérrez helps them arrange their affairs, sometimes taking up to 30 to 40 minutes before they walk toward the agents. She encourages them to call their families one last time and share their Alien Registration Number, and then to write phone numbers on their bodies so they can call family if they’re detained.
If they’re willing to share personal information and their keys, she offers to let their family know if they’re detained, send another team to visit them in detention, connect them with a lawyer when available and move their vehicle so it doesn’t incur fines before their family can pick it up.

Many people are in shock when judges dismiss their cases, Gutiérrez said. “It’s incomprehensible for many of them, who say, ‘I paid taxes. I already have an apartment. I have a car … why are they going to detain me?’”
At that point, Gutiérrez said, “There really is no escape. You have to pass, no matter what, by the immigration agents. So it’s like Jesus, who goes directly to the cross.”
The Rev. Chloe Breyer, an Episcopal priest and director of the Interfaith Center of New York, told RNS witnessing detentions was “harrowing.”
“ All I could do is get their name in this tiny millisecond between when they left the courtroom door and when they were picked up by these officers,” she said.
“ We’re witnessing a kind of public display of lawlessness,” Breyer added. She, like Gutiérrez, said there seemed to be no “rhyme or reason” behind which immigrants were detained and which were able to leave.
The Episcopal Diocese of New York has publicized that three of their parishioners have been detained in courthouse arrests and has held a training on court accompaniment for over 80 clergy, said Mary Rothwell Davis, the diocese’s vice-chancellor for immigration and refugees. On July 8, Bishop Matthew E. Heyd witnessed immigration court detentions.

Breyer said she has gone to immigration court about half a dozen times in the last six months, along with rabbis and other Christian leaders. She has worked with the New Sanctuary Coalition, through which she shows up to accompany immigrants who happen to be there that day, and also with specific clients at the request of their lawyers.
In Los Angeles, Isaac Cuevas, director of immigration and public affairs for the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles, has trained about 180 priests, deacons and religious sisters in court accompaniment. While they make an effort to match parishioners who request accompaniment for immigration court with someone who has gone through the program, the vowed religious largely create their own schedules for going to courts in the area.
“If people are in need, then we try to come forward and answer that call however possible,” said Cuevas, emphasizing that they do so not by civil disobedience, but through prayer, solidarity and recommendations to seek legal advice.
Another LA group, Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice, observes courts daily.
In Arizona, Alicia Contreras, executive director of Corazón AZ, part of the grassroots multi-faith Faith in Action federation, said faith leaders in the state attend immigration court when community members request accompaniment. It is part of the group’s broader work, including know-your-rights and family defense planning, when a family makes plans for children, pets and bills in the event of a crisis. Corazón AZ has partnered with Puente, another Phoenix organizing group that maintains a more regular presence at the courthouse.
Corazón AZ has sent Disciples of Christ, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Catholics, Unitarian Universalists and volunteers without a specific tradition to the courthouse. The majority have been lay people.
“If I can offer a word of prayer, if I have brought folks a rosary or just sat with them, give them a gentle touch on their back, a hug when they need it, this goes a long way to calm the nerves,” Contreras said. She reminds immigrants to breathe. “We are not in control of a lot, but we are in control of our breathing.”
Fear can also cause immigrants to “black out” during their hearings, leaving them unable to remember what happened, Contreras said, explaining that faith leaders can help explain what happened afterward. In the worst cases, fear can lead community members to skip their court dates, a guaranteed way to enter deportation proceedings, she said.
Court accompaniment is an expression of faith, Contreras said.
“I know that their higher power, or in my faith tradition, God, does not want this for them,” said Contreras, a Catholic. “God is not putting the barriers, and God also is not wanting us to look away.”
Grand Canyon megafire portends troubled future for national parks
A group of Catholics revitalized a remote Arizona village before the diocese ordered them to leave
CONCHO, Ariz. (AP) — The village of Concho in the Arizona high desert is home to about 50 people — barely a dot in a sprawling, dusty landscape speckled with clumps of grass, scrub oak and juniper. Concho, about 200 miles northeast of Phoenix, has one restaurant, a Dollar General and a gas station that closes at 7 p.m.
But this remote hamlet is now at the center of a Catholic Church controversy.
Over the last six months, several members of this tight-knit community have been speaking up in support of a lay group of young Catholics who call themselves the League of the Blessed Sacrament. They say the group has revitalized this ignored, poverty-stricken region.
However, leaders at the New Mexico-based Diocese of Gallup, which oversees the region, contend that group members misrepresented themselves as a religious order and engaged in activity not sanctioned by the Catholic Church. Bishop James S. Wall ordered the group to leave parish housing and stop leading liturgy and teaching in the region’s Catholic school.
Group members — Giovanni Vizcarra, Edward Seeley, Eric Faris, Anthony Ribaya and Lisa Hezmalhalch — maintain they have represented themselves truthfully and followed the diocese’s orders. They believe the diocese, the poorest in the nation, asked them to leave because leaders are worried about potential liability stemming from the group taking three boys, victims of alleged domestic abuse, into their care.
Diocese spokesperson Suzanne Hammons said Wall and the diocese are “not afraid of liability” and are accustomed to dealing with sensitive situations in their parishes and schools. The diocese has a duty to properly investigate all allegations and go through official channels to ensure everyone’s safety, she said.
Why the group came to Concho
The men arrived in Concho about four years ago from the Canons Regular of Immaculate Conception, an Augustinian community in Santa Paula, California, after accusing their superior of abuse and inappropriate behavior. They were dismissed a month later, after an investigation by the order’s leaders in Rome concluded there was no evidence supporting those allegations.
Vizcarra said a sympathetic priest bought them plane tickets to Arizona, suggesting they take time to ponder their future. Concho was different from Los Angeles, where hundreds attended Mass on Sundays. They initially found the small community’s intimacy uncomfortable.
“People would ask you what your favorite color is or what your favorite cake is,” Vizcarra said. The ladies would call him “mijo,” a Spanish term of endearment that means “my son.”
Gradually, the sense of community became a healing salve and they learned to embrace it, he said.
Group revitalized struggling parish and community
More than two dozen residents from Concho and surrounding towns spoke passionately in support of the League of the Blessed Sacrament, saying the newcomers revitalized the community and parish. They’ve distributed food to the needy, hosted birthday parties for children whose families had nothing, breathed life into the village church with holy music and liturgy, and revived Concho’s historic Christmas fiesta that had recently floundered.
Angela Murphy, a longtime resident and local historian, said the men prayed at the church seven times a day.
“It was because of them that we heard church bells in Concho once again,” she said.
After they were dismissed from their religious community, the group stopped wearing their habits and requested community members not address them as “brothers” or “sister.” But people still would out of reverence, Murphy said.
Group members now wear black outfits, including sweatshirts bearing the logo of their organization, which Vizcarra said they founded years ago as seminarians in California.
In their four years in Concho, they started an animal farm, a thrift store, a Catholic bookstore, a farmer’s market and a coffee shop. The stores and a radio station, which the group purchased rights to, are in the heart of Concho. Vizcarra said they paid for projects with their teaching salaries, fundraising and donations from family members.
The group’s work with children
They taught at St. Anthony’s Catholic School in Show Low, a nearby town, until the diocese fired them in February.
Vizcarra taught religion, Spanish and robotics; Seeley, math and religion; Faris, art; Ribaya, music. Hezmalhalch taught first grade. They all taught catechism as well.
Several families shared stories of troubled or academically struggling children flourishing under their tutelage. Students who showed no interest in religion wanted to be baptized and confirmed after attending catechism, they said.
The men also cared for three boys who came from troubled homes, including two brothers. With permission of the boys’ mothers, they helped house the children with a local resident who opened up her rental unit.
One boy’s mother, Katherine Therese Heal, who shares custody of her son with Vizcarra, said the men have been strong role models for her son as she was divorcing his stepfather. She said her son, now 14, was depressed, had low self-esteem and loathed school.
“Now, he wants to go to college,” Heal said. “What the brothers have done with him is miraculous. They have been the answer to my prayers.”
Vizcarra said he and his colleagues initially balked at assuming parental roles.
“We felt these children needed normal families and we’re not parents or dads,” he said.
That reluctance eased when Heal’s son responded with joyful tears when asked if he wanted to be under their care. Heal confirmed that Vizcarra and the men had begun the process to adopt her son.
“While it feels strange because none of us signed up to be a parent, we believe this is a way God has shown us to help people in dire need,” Vizcarra said.
Community demands answers
Hope MacMonagle, a Concho native, said the group has done “more for our Catholic community in three years than the diocese has done in decades.”
“When the brothers came here, it was like a breath of fresh air,” she said. “I’m a cradle Catholic and I love my religion. But when they got here, it was like I was learning my religion all over again.”
MacMonagle said she and others have asked the diocese why this group was told to leave. They have been met with silence, she said.
“Sometimes, I get the feeling that people don’t listen to us because we are small, insignificant, just a few people in the middle of nowhere,” she said.
The group also was known in surrounding towns, such as Show Low, St. Johns and Snowflake. John and Ann Bunn, Show Low residents, met them at St. Rita’s parish. She said the group did not “entrench” themselves in the community.
“They were, rather, embraced by the people here because of their good deeds and the enormous amount of goodwill they’ve built here,” John Bunn said.
Longtime Concho resident Christine Bennett became emotional ticking through the answers she is demanding from the diocese.
“We just want to know why,” she said. “We see all that they’ve done to light up this community. Now, they’re being ripped out of our parish and our hearts. Why is this happening?”
Hammons said the diocese has not responded to residents because “the answers to these questions are not appropriate to air publicly.”
The way forward
Last month, the group moved to Vernon, about 25 miles (40 kilometers) south of Concho. They’ve started a K-12 Catholic school. They are moving the farm animals as well but will maintain a presence in Concho with their shops and radio station.
Despite the struggle for acceptance from the diocese, group members said they’ve received the healing they sought in Concho through their community service. But it still hurts and “wasn’t supposed to be this way,” said Faris, a Protestant minister who converted to Catholicism and wanted to become a priest.
“But God has provided us a way to be more holy and in a way, more conformed to him.”
Faris and others say they still feel called to be priests, but are unsure if that will happen.
Seeley said he is focusing on service and prayer. All members say they are keeping up their vows of poverty, chastity and obedience.
Ribaya said he will never “sacrifice truth and justice for the sake of being a priest.”
“If God wants us to be priests, he’ll make it happen,” he said. “If it has to take 30 or 40 years, so be it.”
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Refuerzo fronterizo bajo Trump deja sin trabajo a comunidades como Yuma
‘Sentí que fallé a mi familia’: el golpe invisible de Trump a la frontera en Yuma

Araceli Aquino-Valdez / Plumas Invitadas
Una noche de marzo, Isaac Valdez jugaba con su bebé de un año en casa. Acababa de terminar su turno como guardia de seguridad en una instalación de procesamiento de la Patrulla Fronteriza en Yuma, Arizona.
Entonces, su teléfono vibró. Era una notificación de WhatsApp.
Al leer el mensaje, su rostro cambió. Volvió a leerlo, esta vez más despacio. No había error: después de tres años de trabajo, su empleo había terminado con un simple mensaje de texto. La Patrulla Fronteriza había cancelado el contrato con la empresa de seguridad con la que trabajaba, y debía entregar su uniforme y equipo al día siguiente.
Isaac llevaba tiempo trabajando en esas instalaciones, con un salario de 30 dólares por hora. Ese sueldo le permitió comprar su primera casa y empezar una familia, todo antes de cumplir los 30.

En sus campañas pasadas, la inmigración siempre ha sido un tema central para el presidente Donald Trump. Eso no cambió en su candidatura de 2024, con la que finalmente ganó las elecciones.
“Hacia finales del año pasado, hablábamos sobre lo que podría pasar con el cambio político. El regreso del presidente Trump, con un enfoque fuerte en seguridad fronteriza e inmigración, hacía evidente que su administración afectaría trabajos como el de mi esposo”, dijo Araceli, esposa de Isaac.
Lo que no se imaginaban era que la Oficina de Aduanas y Protección Fronteriza (CBP) anunciaría el cierre de varias instalaciones temporales, incluyendo la de Yuma, debido a la caída en cruces fronterizos. Según la Casa Blanca y CBP, desde que Trump regresó a la presidencia, las detenciones en la frontera suroeste han disminuido en un 85%.
“Aunque intentamos mantenernos positivos, no esperábamos que las consecuencias llegaran tan rápido. Poco más de un mes después de que asumiera el cargo, llegó ese mensaje que le quitó su trabajo”, comentó.
La seguridad fronteriza y la inmigración son temas complejos y polémicos. Para muchos, la disminución de cruces fronterizos puede parecer una victoria, pero para la familia Valdez representó la pérdida de un centro laboral que sostenía a cientos de familias como la suya.
“En un lugar como Yuma”, señaló Isaac, “donde el mercado laboral ya es pequeño, el golpe se sintió aún más fuerte”.
“Es cierto que estas instalaciones eran temporales, pero la gente que trabajaba en ellas no. Personas como mi esposo dedicaron años de su vida ahí. Compraron casas, formaron familias”, expresó Araceli.
Ahora, las instalaciones ya no existen, pero la comunidad sigue sobreviviendo en Yuma mientras la población crece y las oportunidades disminuyen.
“Mi esposo no podía creer que todo terminara de un día para otro. Durante semanas seguía en shock. Era difícil aceptar que el lugar donde pasó casi todos sus días por años simplemente desapareciera”, recordó. “Eso lo afectó profundamente”.
Después de cinco años en los Marines, Isaac siempre trabajó duro, sin pasar mucho tiempo desempleado. Ahora, pasa el tiempo cuidando a la bebé mientras Araceli trabaja como profesional de comunicaciones para una organización comunitaria llamada Rural Arizona Engagement.
“Aunque valoramos el tiempo con nuestra hija, sé que esto ha afectado su confianza. Siempre fue un proveedor orgulloso y, perder esa identidad de forma tan repentina lo hizo cuestionar su valor. Me ha dicho más de una vez que siente que nos falló”, detalla Araceli con tristeza.
Por si no lo leíste: Conecta Arizona gradúa a segunda generación de Plumas Invitadas; tenemos a 20 nuevos colaboradores
Financieramente, la familia de Isaac y Araceli sobrevive con su ingreso. Apenas logran cubrir los gastos, cuidando cada dólar.
Si yo perdiera mi trabajo también, no sé qué sería de nosotros, pero trato de no pensar en eso. Tengo fe en que se abrirán nuevas puertas.
La instalación donde trabajaba no empleaba a una sola compañía. Había personal de seguridad, cuidadores, cocineros y más, todos contratados por distintas empresas. Cuando cerró, todos fueron despedidos.
Durante una venta del Día de los Caídos en JCPenney, una cajera reconoció a Isaac. Ella también había trabajado en la misma instalación, como cuidadora de familias y niños migrantes. Su equipo también fue despedido, y les compartió que fue difícil encontrar empleo desde entonces.
“Una amiga mía tenía un hermano que trabajaba como guardia en otra empresa contratada por el mismo sitio. También lo despidieron”, dijo Araceli.
Es que Yuma es así de pequeño, asegura. Todos conocen a alguien que trabajaba en ese lugar. Ahora está cerrado, y sus empleos desaparecieron, pero las personas siguen aquí, enfrentando un mercado laboral aún más limitado.
En abril de 2025, el condado de Yuma registró la tasa de desempleo más alta en todo Arizona, un 11.3 %, casi el triple del promedio estatal. El gobierno canceló estos contratos de forma abrupta, sin considerar a quienes dependían de ellos para vivir. Aunque muchos de estos trabajadores colaboraban codo a codo con agentes federales, no eran empleados del gobierno.
Al terminarse los contratos, los empleados fueron excluidos de cualquier conversación o apoyo. Muchos eran veteranos militares, como Isaac, y ni siquiera recibieron una advertencia previa, solo un mensaje de texto con la instrucción de devolver su equipo al día siguiente.
Un informe de 2024 del Centro de Educación y Fuerza Laboral de la Universidad de Georgetown recomienda invertir en capacitación, educación y desarrollo de infraestructura laboral en comunidades rurales. Aunque casi la mitad de los empleos rurales son considerados “buenos trabajos”, cada vez son más difíciles de encontrar. En ciudades como Yuma, las brechas son más profundas, pero las soluciones como la formación laboral o la planificación a largo plazo rara vez se priorizan.
“Hemos trabajado duro para llegar hasta aquí, pero cuando el ingreso de tu familia puede desaparecer de la noche a la mañana, sin red de apoyo, cuesta sentir que el esfuerzo realmente vale la pena”, comentó Isaac.
Araceli sostiene a su hija Azul entre sus brazos, la observa sonreír, mientras finca sus esperanzas en que la situación financiera del país no empeore bajo la administración de Trump. Ella espera que su hija tenga un mejor futuro.
“Quienes se levantan cada día, quienes sirven a su país, y quienes construyen sus vidas en comunidades como Yuma, merecen algo mejor. Necesitamos empleos confiables, liderazgo que escuche y sistemas que no nos dejen atrás”: Araceli.
Nota: Los nombres y apellidos de algunas personas han sido cambiados para proteger su identidad.
Conecta Arizona no es responsable del contenido de las columnas y artículos de nuestros colaboradores comunitarios. Las publicaciones de quienes colaboran con Conecta Arizona no expresan su línea editorial.

The post Refuerzo fronterizo bajo Trump deja sin trabajo a comunidades como Yuma appeared first on Conecta Arizona.
En Arizona, Poder en Acción capacita a empresarios sobre qué hacer y cómo responder si Inmigración llega a sus negocios

La organización Poder en Acción, que asiste a inmigrantes en Arizona, realizará este martes un taller llamado “Conoce tus derechos”, dirigido a empresarios que quieran aprender qué hacer legalmente y cómo responder si agentes de Inmigración llegan a sus negocios. La capacitación será de 6 pm a 7:30 pm en el 4414 N de la 7° Avenida en Phoenix, Arizona, y para más información se puede llamar al 602.919.7004.
“Estamos informando a nuestra gente sobre sus derechos, pero también a los empresarios, para que todos sepan qué hacer al momento de que venga Inmigración. Los empresarios deben tener un plan para poder saber cómo van a intervenir para proteger a sus clientes y también a sus empleados”, señaló Miros Mejía, de Poder en Acción, en declaraciones a La Hora del Cafecito, el programa de radio de Conecta Arizona.
Mejía, además, dijo que Poder en Acción acompaña a los inmigrantes que deben ir a sus citas en las cortes de Inmigración, para asistirlos ante posibles detenciones de ICE. “Mi mejor recomendación es que tienen que atender a nuestras cortes, pero no lo tienen que hacer solos porque también hay ese miedo de que si voy y qué tal si no regreso. El trabajo que estamos haciendo es también acompañar a las cortes, para que la persona no tenga que ir sola”, agregó Mejías, entrevistada por Maritza L. Félix.

Vamos a platicar de lo que hemos estado viviendo en Arizona en los últimos 6 meses, cuando gran parte de nuestra comunidad migrante se ha sentido más desafiada que nunca. ¿Qué han visto en las calles?
“Desde que empezamos en esta administración presidencial hemos visto más los ataques contra la comunidad latina, específicamente la comunidad migrante. Localmente aquí hemos visto ataques de ‘la migra’ que empezaron en las cortes. Y luego han incrementado donde hemos visto desde junio 10 que Inmigración se está viendo por todas partes de Arizona, están yendo a lugares públicos como los Home Depot, a hogares, a los trabajos a hacer los chequeos, estamos viendo Inmigración por todos lados. Estamos viendo familias y a nuestra comunidad separadas y no sabemos cómo va a seguir este proceso que tiene planeado esta Administración con las deportaciones, esto es algo que no hemos visto anteriormente”.
Hemos visto que bajo las directrices del presidente Donald Trump ha dicho que se iba a enfocar en ciertos lugares a la hora de cumplir con las leyes de inmigración y se supone que ha puesto una cuota de 3,000 detenciones y deportaciones al día, principalmente en ciudades que son gobernadas por demócratas, como Phoenix y Tucson en Arizona. Pero le ha puesto como un énfasis muy importante a los negocios latinos también. ¿Cómo se pueden proteger estos dueños de negocios en dado caso de que al final de cuentas los agentes lleguen tocando las puertas de sus comercios?
“En negocios hay áreas que son partes públicas y partes privadas. Los empresarios se pueden proteger sabiendo sus derechos, cómo cumplir con las órdenes que lleva Inmigración y también saber que tienen el derecho de no cumplir con esas órdenes. Ellos tienen el derecho de trabajar o no trabajar con Inmigración, pero no muchos empresarios saben que pueden hacer eso. También tienen el derecho de defender a sus empleados y a sus clientes presentes. Y el modo de hacer esto es aprender cómo hacer entender sus derechos, también crear un plan de acción para que no solo el propietario sepa qué acciones tomar, pero también los gerentes; es activar a todos los empleados en el negocio para que todos estén al tanto de cuáles son sus derechos en caso de que llegue Inmigración”.
Cuando estaba el sheriff (Joe) Arpaio las redadas en los lugares de trabajo eran muy invasivas, podíamos ver las patrullas, el despliegue policíaco que se hacía para arrestar principalmente a los trabajadores bajo la ley estatal de sanción al empleador, ahora es una directiva federal. ¿Cuáles son los negocios que podrían estar más vulnerables, los que sí necesitan cumplir con el E-Verify? ¿Cuáles son los que deberían abrir la puerta y cuáles podrían decir ‘aquí no entra nadie’?
“Los negocios que hemos visto que fueron más impactados al principio fueron carnicerías, gasolinerías, que tienen también intercambio de dinero. Hemos visto cómo han cambiado ahora, por ejemplo a las tiendas como los Food City, los súper, estamos viendo más lugares donde gente va a comprar comida. Cualquier otro negocio puede ser impactado, no sabemos la agenda de esta Administración. Queremos que cada empresa, cada negocio pueda tener un plan de acción, que todos los empleados puedan saber sus derechos y crear un plan de seguridad para que todos estén listos en caso de esto pase. Es todo inseguro cómo va a procesar la Administración Trump la segunda ronda de redadas o qué va a pasar. En Poder en Acción estamos informando a nuestra gente sobre sus derechos, pero también a los empresarios, para que todos sepan qué hacer al momento de que venga Inmigración”.

¿Cómo hacemos también para proteger a los clientes? Porque hemos visto últimamente que las autoridades tienen la discrecionalidad, por ejemplo, de preguntar el estatus migratorio, no solamente a la persona a la que van a buscar sino a las personas que están alrededor de ella. Esto siempre se ha hecho, pero por un período de tiempo estuvo como más tranquilo, pero ahora los agentes sí están utilizando esta discrecionalidad y eso es lo que también tiene con desasosiego a nuestra comunidad.
“Sí, eso es cierto. Como propietarios, después de tener este conocimiento legal, saber derechos, saber cómo hablar con los agentes de Inmigración o cómo pedir las órdenes, otra cosa es saber que en espacios públicos si Inmigración nos pide nuestra información no tenemos que cumplir y decirles nuestra nacionalidad, pero sí nos podemos identificar, dar nuestra información y luego preguntar si estamos arrestados o no. Tenemos que hacer verbal esa pregunta porque necesitamos saber si nos van a dejar ir o no. Si no tienen una orden judicial firmada por un juez para uno lo que hemos visto también es que Inmigración no está cumpliendo con las leyes. Hay casos de personas que se las han llevado en espacios públicos y por eso es importante que los empresarios sepan qué hacer en esos casos: documentar si Inmigración no está cumpliendo con la ley y si está llevando a personas injustamente. Es difícil, porque ahí se va a abusar de los derechos humanos. Los empresarios deben tener ese plan de poder saber cómo van a intervenir para proteger a sus clientes y también a sus empleados”.
Otra de las preguntas que hemos recibido es el temor que existe por la presencia de las autoridades migratorias afuera de las cortes de Inmigración. Muchos de estos pequeños propietarios son personas que aún tienen casos pendientes con el sistema judicial y que no saben si deberían o no presentarse en estas audiencias que ya tienen pactadas desde hace mucho; ellos pensaban que por cumplir con todo a tiempo y estarse presentando iba a haber algún tipo de recompensa migratoria al final, pero ahora les da mucho miedo tener que acercarse a una corte de Inmigración cuando podrían cerrar su caso y terminar deportados.
“Eso es cierto. El miedo es válido, es muy válido porque no sabemos cuándo va a estar Inmigración. Esto de Inmigración en las Cortes en las cortes es algo nuevo, es un piloto nuevo que se vio en diferentes ciudades, no solo en Phoenix. Mi mejor recomendación es que tenemos que cumplir con esas órdenes y atender a nuestras cortes, pero no lo tienen que hacer solos porque también hay ese miedo de que si voy y qué tal si no regreso. Para lo que está pasando hay mucho movimiento y trabajo hecho por organizaciones comunitarias. Mi recomendación es si usted o un ser querido tiene que ir a su corte póngase en contacto para pedir que alguien lo acompañe. El trabajo que estamos haciendo es también acompañar a las cortes, para que la persona no tenga que ir sola. Porque cuando una persona es llevada por Inmigración es muy difícil para que nuestros seres queridos nos busquen y sepan dónde vamos a estar. Es para dejarle saber a tus seres queridos lo más rápido posible, para que no tengan que llevar tiempo sin escuchar de ti. Hay un equipo que está apoyando en las cortes y el número es 480.506.7437”.
Nos llegan comentarios a WhatsApp de que algunos pequeños propietarios decidieron no hacer su declaración de impuestos por el miedo de la cooperación de las autoridades migratorias con las agencias fiscales, en este caso con el IRS, para evitar volver a ponerse en riesgo con las autoridades. ¿Eso es algo que se trata también dentro del taller de ‘Conoce tus derechos’?
“Sí, vamos a ver un poco más de esa información legal en el taller que vamos a presentar este martes (24 de junio) y también vamos a dar recursos sobre abogados de inmigración. Es importante que consulten con abogados de inmigración, especialmente estas preguntas, para que puedan hacer una decisión de cómo quieren seguir adelante con sus impuestos. Quiero invitar a empresarios a los que les gustaría ser parte de una red de negocios donde ellos quieran saber, tener herramientas para prepararse mejor”.

The post En Arizona, Poder en Acción capacita a empresarios sobre qué hacer y cómo responder si Inmigración llega a sus negocios appeared first on Conecta Arizona.
Community Preps Summer Lunch Program for Kids

Local community organizations and volunteers in Patagonia are banding together to offer free lunches to local kids starting June 9.
The post Community Preps Summer Lunch Program for Kids appeared first on Patagonia Regional Times.
28 people charged with violating new ‘National Defense Area’ along New Mexico border
Trump directive creates chaos on the Colorado River
Daniel Herrera Carbajal
ICT
In March, Gila River took out 10,000 acre-feet of their allotted water from Lake Mead after the Trump administration’s Unleashing American Energy executive order froze money for any program related to the Inflation Reduction Act. The act, which Congress passed during the Biden Administration in 2022, allocated money for tribes and states in exchange for giving up some of their shares of Colorado River water.
The Trump administration later unfroze the Inflation Reduction Act funds that would be used for water conservation projects and to build canals. The act allocated around $4 billion to compensate tribes, states and other organizations to not take water out of the Colorado River to use to generate revenue like crops.
Gila River Governor Stephen Roe Lewis wrote a letter to the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Feb. 11 before removing Colorado River water from Lake Mead.
“We have given the department every opportunity to avoid what could be a calamitous break in our longstanding partnership, with terrible consequences for the entire basin,” he said.
If water levels continue dropping, hydroelectric dams on the Colorado River will not be able to generate electricity. But the compensation to not take water out of the river has been seen as a short-term solution by many experts, including Mark Squillace, a professor of law at the University of Colorado Boulder who specializes in natural resource law.
“My concern is that the Biden administration seemed to be focused on short-term buyouts of water consumption,” he said. “I just don’t think that kind of approach is sustainable. What we need on the Colorado River are permanent reductions in consumption, and so spending a lot of money to temporarily buy out the rights of people to use all of their water, right, is just not something that is going to solve the problem.”
Thirty tribes have rights to the Colorado River. The river is a resource, but for the Zuni Pueblo it is the source of life.
“For the Zuni people, the Colorado River is really important because the river and the Grand Canyon are our homeland. That’s where the Zunis emerged,” said Councilman of Zuni Pueblo Edward Wemytewa.
The Colorado River has important cultural significance to each tribe that has water rights to it, but the Colorado River compact that outlined how the river would be divided was not drafted in consultation with tribes.
“Laws were created by the US governments, by the US agencies, and during those times, the federal government, in the name of public interest, they started delineating territories. They start creating laws about water usage, water compacts,” said Wemytewa. “Well, in those earlier years, when the laws were being developed and implemented, the Zuni was not at the table. Many Native peoples weren’t at the table.
“Under federal law, those tribes have the right to take their water, usually in priority over everybody else, because the date of priority for Indian water rights is the date of their reservations, which is typically within the 19th century,” said Squillace. “So those water rights tended to date back before other non-Indian users.
“Those are legal rights that they are entitled to. And so one of the things I’ve suggested in my article is that maybe we should think about closing down the river to new appropriations. Why are we continuing to appropriate new water rights when we have this crisis and we have early water rights from Native American tribes that are currently legal but not being utilized for a number of different reasons?” he said.
The current compact being used was created in 1922, and it divided the river into two basins – upper and lower.
Each basin was allotted no more than 7.5 million acre-feet of water per year, equaling 15 million acre-feet of water each year. Mexico was also allocated 1.5 million acre-feet a year. The amount of water the river produces was vastly overestimated at the time of the compact’s creation.
“At the time that they negotiated the compact, it was thought that there was maybe 18 million acre feet of water on an annual basis in the river, which turned out not to be true,” said Squillace.
Currently, the Colorado River is producing about 12.5 million acre-feet a year. A vast over-allocation of water has led to states battling over water and how to use it.
Squillace proposed a new Colorado River compact. It proposes to update states’ water usage laws and to bring tribal nations into the conversation.
“I’ve suggested that maybe we could come up with a new compact, which would look very different from the current compact, but would basically be an agreement among the states to modernize their water laws,” he said. “Right now we have a number of principles in the various state water laws that I think allow for, I don’t want to call them wasteful, but at least inefficient uses. We could increase our efficiency in terms of the amount of water that we use if we sort of refined what we call beneficial use. There’s a principle in western water law that you only get as much water as can be beneficially used.”
For the Zuni Pueblo, a history of strong-handed negotiations and a lack of knowledge of a government system that is not their own led to signing deals that did not benefit them.
“When there were any land settlements or water settlements, tribes were never provided attorneys.Tribes were never given a heads up, They were never given funding to educate ourselves as Indigenous peoples,” Wemytewa said. “We are stewards of the water. We find the corn seed central. The corn seed is central. In fact, our abstract name is Children of Corn because we’re farmers, we’re agricultural people. What agricultural people would give up their water rights? What agricultural people would give up their watershed? We didn’t have much choice.”
Tribes have priority over everyone else when it comes to their water rights pertaining to the Colorado River, which means they must have a voice in the conversation.
“There are 30 Native American tribes with water rights along the Colorado River. And it may be impractical to basically have all 30 tribes represented during negotiations. We’ve got seven states, two countries, 30 tribes. That would be a very difficult kind of negotiation,” he said.
“But you could certainly have some representatives. The reason it’s tricky is that not all tribes agree on the best approach here. And so it’s important that we treat individual Native American tribes as people who can have their own views that might be different from other tribes. And so how do you ensure fair representation of all the tribal views without actually putting all those tribes at the table during negotiation?”
For Wemytewa, a new compact with tribes involved is necessary.
“Today, as a tribal leader, I submit comments to federal agencies, whether it’s the National Park Service or the Bureau of Land Management or (U.S. Geological Survey). We submit our comments trying to provide guidance to the federal agencies that you have to consider that you can’t continue to open up the lands. You cannot continue to give away water, because by doing so, you continue to remove Indigenous peoples from their aboriginal lands to make room for other people, other cultures.”

Our stories are worth telling. Our stories are worth sharing. Our stories are worth your support. Contribute $5 or $10 today to help ICT carry out its critical mission. Sign up for ICT’s free newsletter!