Elizabethtown, Tupper Lake and Ticonderoga inch toward water solutions

A trio of longstanding water infrastructure problems across the Adirondack Park are gradually moving toward solutions, though town leaders continue to call for more support from state officials.
Elizabethtown expects to advance engineering designs for its planned new public sewer system this year. Tupper Lake is on the verge of testing well sites and locating a new treatment plant. And a task force in Ticonderoga is exploring options it hopes will allow a wilderness pond to continue being used as a water source for a pocket of residents around Eagle Lake.
For years, leaders of all three towns have sought to address core water issues that stymie economic growth and threaten public and environmental health. Tupper Lake and Ticonderoga are both under standing orders to move away from surface water drinking sources — or adopt costly treatment technologies — while Elizabethtown has long considered establishing a municipal sewer system, the only county seat in the state without one.
While still far from sure things, community leaders are growing more hopeful they may be closer than ever to finding long-term solutions to the persistent challenges. Adirondack projects are seeking tens of millions of dollars to rehab public drinking and wastewater systems, and some communities are banking grant wins and dollars.

Building a $38 million project in Elizabethtown
Elizabethtown Supervisor Cathleen Reusser is taking every chance she can to explain her town’s need for public sewers to state officials.
During a recent visit to Albany, she met with Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Amanda Lefton and briefly pitched the project to Gov. Kathy Hochul at an event. Reusser later hosted a meeting with staff from DEC and the Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC), resulting in suggestions for ways Elizabethtown could bolster its chances at future state dollars.
A $500,000 grant from the Northern Border Regional Commission along with $125,000 of the town’s money will support more detailed engineering plans, which could in turn boost the town’s state grant scores. The town recently signed a contract for the engineering plans, which Reusser said would take most of the year to complete.
The plan is to establish a wastewater treatment plant on town land near a public golf course and run sewers in a new sewer district comprising much of the hamlet.
“I’m feeling very optimistic about this,” Reusser said.
The project, which also includes decommissioning current septic systems, is estimated to cost around $38 million. Elizabethtown in recent years has unsuccessfully applied for EFC funding, conducting a door-to-door income survey and stream water sampling to improve its chances.
Reusser said she doesn’t think residents of the sewer districts — shown through the income survey to have median household income of less than $35,000 — should have to shoulder the cost burden of building the system. She said she hoped to build a financing package through state funding and a mix of other grant programs, as well as payments from the system’s largest users.
“It is very loudly stated that those folks can’t afford a lot,” Reusser said. “Operations and maintenance is the only thing you can realistically put on those household ratepayers.”
Reusser said the town was gaining momentum for the sewer project but there were still a lot of details to work out.
“This is still not a for-sure project,” she said. “But I think we have done a great job of painting the picture of a disadvantaged community and the absolute necessity of this project for the health and wellness of the tributaries to the Boquet River and ultimately the health of Lake Champlain.”
Fixing brown water in Tupper Lake
Tupper Lake is also pursuing a major infrastructure project to move its drinking water supply completely to groundwater sources and resolve a persistent problem with browning and discoloration caused by high levels of iron and manganese.
Like many other communities, Tupper Lake was ordered to move from surface water to groundwater sources but has struggled to fully replace its previous sources with reliable wells.
The community, which still gets about one-third of its water supply from Simond Pond, explored both options, said village mayor Mary Fontana, but determined a new treatment plant and a third well was the best option.
“Groundwater is the most sustainable and affordable option for the community,” Fontana said.

Tupper Lake has also struggled to win the state funding its leaders say are needed to make the project work. State lawmakers have raised Tupper Lake’s challenges specifically with state officials during public hearings. Fontana said she continues to make the case that it should be a priority for the state.
“I think supplying clean drinking water to a rural community in the Adirondack Park should be at the top of that list,” Fontana said.
Residents have been deeply frustrated by the discoloration that has persisted since switching to groundwater wells, regularly posting pictures on social media of brownish water filling drinking glasses and bathtubs.
Fontana called the results of a pilot test last year of the proposed water treatment technology “remarkable.” The idea is to use a special filtration system to target the iron and manganese that are causing browning of the water.
“We will be able to treat the water and deliver clean, clear water to our customers,” she said.

Solving a decades-long problem in Ticonderoga
Jim O’Bryan took the reins as Ticonderoga town supervisor at the beginning of the year, with hopes of solving a problem that has stymied town leaders for decades. He wants to find a solution that keeps Gooseneck Pond in the Pharoah Lake Wilderness as a viable drinking water source for residents in Chilson and Eagle Lake, as well as eventually for the town.
“This has been an issue for the town for 34 years,” O’Bryan said. “One of my goals was to hopefully solve it.”
O’Bryan established a task force charged with evaluating options. He said he hopes to move toward a plan to set up a new water district for Eagle Lake residents, while finding a viable treatment option at Gooseneck that will pass muster with regulators.
Alternatively, the town is using state funds to study potential wellfield sites that could also supply Eagle Lake residents with a drinking source. He said an engineer that specializes in ultraviolet filtration will meet with the task force in the coming weeks.

“There are very few waters you will find in the Adirondacks with as clean of water as Gooseneck,” O’Bryan said.
He said he hoped in the long term they could also find a way to send water downhill from Gooseneck to Ticonderogra to mix with the town’s existing well sources to help reduce that water’s hardness.
For other communities, success comes slowly
For seven straight years, Lake Luzerne applied for a $1.5 million grant from EFC to upgrade its aging drinking water system. Last year it asked for $1.75 million to account for rising costs.
Every request was rejected.
“We get the same form letter,” said Jim Niles, who took over as Lake Luzerne supervisor earlier this year. “It says your application was excellent, but we didn’t have enough funding to get to you. It’s been kind of disappointing.”
Niles said after several years of sending in the same application, Lake Luzerne started to make more tweaks in recent years, hoping more details would improve its chances — still to no avail.
“If we keep striking out on some of these grants, at some point we are going to have to borrow some money,” Niles said. “We can’t keep kicking the can down the road.”
But the village recently landed a federal grant to cover similar needs, thanks to U.S. Representative Elise Stefanik. Niles said those funds will support upgrading old water storage and distribution lines. There’s still more work to do, he said.
“Our whole system is old,” Niles said.
In Bloomingdale, the Town of St. Armand recently landed a $5 million grant and over $5 million in interest-free financing to replace its drinking water treatment plant, specifically to address the threat of PFOAs, commonly known as “forever chemicals.”
Supervisor Davina Thurston said the community’s water is not in violation of the current regulatory standard for PFOAs, commonly known as “forever chemicals,” but could in the future as those thresholds are expected to be lowered.
“My whole focus is to get as much grant funds as humanly possible so that our ratepayers are not given the brunt of these expenses,” she said.
Town leaders also argued that water infrastructure projects are fundamental to housing challenges — a tie Hochul is seeking to make with new water funding in her proposed budget. The final budget remained under negotiations as of Thursday, but Hochul originally proposed $50 million in new water spending earmarked for projects connected to housing preservation in small rural communities.
“There is no doubt in my mind that these projects are critical for affordable housing,” Thurston said.
Stay connected
Get the Explorer’s environmental news delivered by email each Thursday when you sign up for our “Ripple Effect” newsletter.














